Conservation Reserve Program in Gregory County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 179
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Gregory County, South Dakota totaled $464,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jay Schmitz | Herrick, SD 57538 | $7,034 |
22 | Larry Roggow Family Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $6,741 |
23 | Mayer Bros Ptnsp | Naper, NE 68755 | $6,622 |
24 | David And Berniece Bauld Revocable Living Trust | Herrick, SD 57538 | $6,214 |
25 | Rubel Ranch LLC | Dallas, SD 57529 | $6,196 |
26 | Alan Hartman | Hartford, SD 57033 | $5,838 |
27 | Beverley Rubel | Dallas, SD 57529 | $5,707 |
28 | Brian Schmidt | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $5,645 |
29 | , | $5,584 | |
30 | David Steffen Family Trust | Burke, SD 57523 | $5,499 |
31 | Tc Shire LLC | Granite City, IL 62040 | $5,264 |
32 | Carla Schmitz | Herrick, SD 57538 | $4,940 |
33 | Douglas Bauld | Burke, SD 57523 | $4,666 |
34 | Jay De Boer | Tea, SD 57064 | $4,393 |
35 | Shirley Deboer | Tea, SD 57064 | $4,393 |
36 | Gregg Lundberg | Gregory, SD 57533 | $4,271 |
37 | Faith E Van Zee Revocable Trust | Platte, SD 57369 | $3,986 |
38 | , | $3,640 | |
39 | Brandon L York | Burke, SD 57523 | $3,519 |
40 | Sangster Irrv Real Estate Trust | Dante, SD 57329 | $3,504 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”