Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Haakon County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 44
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Haakon County, South Dakota totaled $85,850 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Glen David Hostutler | Midland, SD 57552 | $1,441 |
22 | Earl Slovek | Philip, SD 57567 | $1,326 |
23 | Dale M Jarman | Midland, SD 57552 | $1,157 |
24 | William Gottsleben | Philip, SD 57567 | $1,053 |
25 | James Gottsleben | Philip, SD 57567 | $1,052 |
26 | Carl Noack | Philip, SD 57567 | $1,041 |
27 | Irma Lefaive | Pierre, SD 57501 | $999 |
28 | Dana Fitzgerald | Milesville, SD 57553 | $859 |
29 | Darrel Terkildsen | Quinn, SD 57775 | $808 |
30 | Marty Burns | Philip, SD 57567 | $795 |
31 | Leonard L Kjerstad Living Trust | Quinn, SD 57775 | $729 |
32 | Clayton K Kjerstad | Wall, SD 57790 | $600 |
33 | Peterson Ranch Partnership | Philip, SD 57567 | $529 |
34 | Thomas Leo Harty | Philip, SD 57567 | $441 |
35 | Lawrence Schofield | Midland, SD 57552 | $311 |
36 | Dean Heeb | Midland, SD 57552 | $300 |
37 | Robert Z Jeffries | Box Elder, SD 57719 | $300 |
38 | Mickey Daly | Midland, SD 57552 | $299 |
39 | Donald R King | Philip, SD 57567 | $226 |
40 | Steven C Knutson | Philip, SD 57567 | $217 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”