Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Hamlin County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 171
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Hamlin County, South Dakota totaled $3,039,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kenneth W Schooley | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $7,875 |
82 | Larry Singrey | Watertown, SD 57201 | $7,310 |
83 | Duayne Singrey | Hazel, SD 57242 | $7,310 |
84 | Jeanette Singrey | Hazel, SD 57242 | $7,310 |
85 | Alvin E Kangas | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $6,383 |
86 | Drumgoon Farm Management LLC | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $6,372 |
87 | Helen Hardy | Clearwater, MN 55320 | $6,236 |
88 | Leon Johnson | Bryant, SD 57221 | $5,999 |
89 | Kopman Brothers | Bryant, SD 57221 | $5,764 |
90 | Walseth Investment | Willmar, MN 56201 | $5,727 |
91 | Mark L Ericksen | Hazel, SD 57242 | $5,616 |
92 | Jason Thomas Lamb | Hazel, SD 57242 | $5,543 |
93 | Steven Welles Larson | Hayti, SD 57241 | $5,506 |
94 | Larry R Clark | Hayti, SD 57241 | $5,397 |
95 | Clayton W Larson | Hayti, SD 57241 | $5,375 |
96 | Charles Myron Lusk | Vienna, SD 57271 | $5,186 |
97 | Jerry D Sauder | Bryant, SD 57221 | $5,161 |
98 | Walseth Family Land Trust | Marshall, MN 56258 | $5,035 |
99 | Walseth Purcell Partnership | Clearwater, MN 55320 | $4,840 |
100 | Gregory D Lund | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $4,685 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”