Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Hamlin County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 178
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Hamlin County, South Dakota totaled $574,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bochek Stock Farms | Vienna, SD 57271 | $30,305 |
2 | James Hunter | Hayti, SD 57241 | $17,487 |
3 | Ronald Francis Thyen | Hayti, SD 57241 | $17,081 |
4 | Dennis J Namken | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $14,865 |
5 | Matthew Herman Abraham | Hazel, SD 57242 | $12,528 |
6 | Rexford Schwartz | Bruce, SD 57220 | $12,109 |
7 | Triple P Livestock LLC | Hayti, SD 57241 | $11,542 |
8 | Rolling Acre Farms Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $10,549 |
9 | Keith Edwin Smith | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $10,132 |
10 | Anthony Greg Opdahl | Hazel, SD 57242 | $10,080 |
11 | Betty R Knadle | Hayti, SD 57241 | $9,675 |
12 | Bret B Buck | Bryant, SD 57221 | $9,405 |
13 | Cory Cliff Stemwedel | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $8,679 |
14 | Nathan N Lakness | Hayti, SD 57241 | $8,399 |
15 | Dale Richard Thue | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $8,175 |
16 | Richard Smith | Hayti, SD 57241 | $7,956 |
17 | Robert R Shultz | Hayti, SD 57241 | $7,856 |
18 | Chad Kenneth Schooley | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $7,592 |
19 | Scott Allen Carlson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $7,443 |
20 | Roger Eugene Rudebusch | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $7,335 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>