Farm Subsidy information
Hamlin County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Hamlin County, South Dakota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 566
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hamlin County, South Dakota totaled $16,977,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Luke Derrin Holzwarth | Hazel, SD 57242 | $94,525 |
| 22 | Abraham Farms LLC | Hazel, SD 57242 | $88,262 |
| 23 | Keith Ebbers | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $84,386 |
| 24 | Joseph Ebbers | Bruce, SD 57220 | $84,386 |
| 25 | Triple F Trucking LLC | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $84,005 |
| 26 | Eugene Norman Fedt | Bryant, SD 57221 | $80,449 |
| 27 | Chad Kenneth Schooley | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $79,277 |
| 28 | Heidi Rae Schooley | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $79,277 |
| 29 | Randall Davis Frederick | Hayti, SD 57241 | $77,919 |
| 30 | Roger John Fritz | Hazel, SD 57242 | $77,265 |
| 31 | Troy Henley | Hayti, SD 57241 | $76,814 |
| 32 | Ronald Francis Thyen | Hayti, SD 57241 | $76,225 |
| 33 | Chad Douglas Noem | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $75,459 |
| 34 | Myron Martin Kuhlman | Hazel, SD 57242 | $71,596 |
| 35 | Tracy Carl Fritz | Hazel, SD 57242 | $68,766 |
| 36 | Scott Popham | Hayti, SD 57241 | $67,988 |
| 37 | Douglas S Thue | Hayti, SD 57241 | $63,387 |
| 38 | Rust Fencing Inc | Estelline, SD 57234 | $61,523 |
| 39 | Gisselbeck Farm | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $61,329 |
| 40 | Dale Richard Thue | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $60,128 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf