Counter Cyclical Program in Hamlin County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 532
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Hamlin County, South Dakota totaled $5,689,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Leroy W Isaacson | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $49,203 |
22 | Larry P Isaacson | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $49,203 |
23 | David Scott Olsen | Hayti, SD 57241 | $47,959 |
24 | Singrey Farms Inc | Hazel, SD 57242 | $46,839 |
25 | Ronald E Jongeling | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $45,902 |
26 | Kenneth Dale Everson | Hayti, SD 57241 | $43,637 |
27 | Harold Vernon Singrey | Hazel, SD 57242 | $39,707 |
28 | Oxford Farms Inc | Hayti, SD 57241 | $39,674 |
29 | Donald Scott Little | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $39,464 |
30 | Mark Allen Jensen | Bryant, SD 57221 | $39,455 |
31 | Dale & Mary Ann Williams Living Trust - Dale Willi | Estelline, SD 57234 | $39,188 |
32 | Curtis E Luken | Hazel, SD 57242 | $39,065 |
33 | K & E Farms Inc | Estelline, SD 57234 | $38,760 |
34 | Bruce Kevin Wadsworth | Hayti, SD 57241 | $35,836 |
35 | Ronald Francis Thyen | Hayti, SD 57241 | $35,613 |
36 | Dennis J Namken | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $35,184 |
37 | Vance Harold Hilliard | Bryant, SD 57221 | $35,167 |
38 | Buck Farms | Bryant, SD 57221 | $34,703 |
39 | Barry Martin Little | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $34,115 |
40 | Larry Abraham | Hazel, SD 57242 | $33,980 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”