Market Gains in Hamlin County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 196
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Hamlin County, South Dakota totaled $5,904,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Duane Alan Smith | Watertown, SD 57201 | $75,807 |
22 | David Scott Olsen | Hayti, SD 57241 | $72,615 |
23 | Robert D Rommereim | Bryant, SD 57221 | $69,930 |
24 | Bradley Jongeling | Estelline, SD 57234 | $69,468 |
25 | Dale & Mary Ann Williams Living Trust - Dale Willi | Estelline, SD 57234 | $68,412 |
26 | Mark Alan Wendling | Bryant, SD 57221 | $67,337 |
27 | Todd Jongeling | Estelline, SD 57234 | $63,467 |
28 | Roger John Fritz | Hazel, SD 57242 | $61,005 |
29 | Kenneth D Hansen | Estelline, SD 57234 | $55,964 |
30 | Roger Michael Smith | Hazel, SD 57242 | $54,769 |
31 | Leland Carl Kettwig | Hazel, SD 57242 | $52,464 |
32 | Singrey Farms Inc | Hazel, SD 57242 | $51,299 |
33 | Ronald Francis Thyen | Hayti, SD 57241 | $50,561 |
34 | Jon T Anderson | Bryant, SD 57221 | $49,800 |
35 | Eugene Norman Fedt | Bryant, SD 57221 | $49,167 |
36 | Jon R Rider | Hazel, SD 57242 | $43,971 |
37 | Mark Alan Brugman | Hazel, SD 57242 | $42,135 |
38 | Clarmont Hutterian Brethren Inc | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $40,700 |
39 | Harold Vernon Singrey | Hazel, SD 57242 | $39,958 |
40 | Clifford Ernest Stemwedel | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $39,276 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”