Market Loss Assistance Program in Hamlin County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 695
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Hamlin County, South Dakota totaled $9,331,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ronna Tekrony | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $38,044 |
62 | Charles Glenn Langerock | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $37,185 |
63 | Terry & Naomi Strohfus Living Trust | Hazel, SD 57242 | $36,987 |
64 | Rick A Anderson | Bryant, SD 57221 | $36,980 |
65 | Mark Allen Jensen | Bryant, SD 57221 | $36,555 |
66 | Laverne Lee Mennenga | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $36,333 |
67 | Jay Lester Prouty | Hayti, SD 57241 | $36,083 |
68 | Bruce Kevin Wadsworth | Hayti, SD 57241 | $35,413 |
69 | Charles D Sour | Hazel, SD 57242 | $35,139 |
70 | D & D Dairy | Hayti, SD 57241 | $35,051 |
71 | Bryce Gjerde | Hazel, SD 57242 | $35,012 |
72 | Jon R Rider | Hazel, SD 57242 | $34,771 |
73 | Alfred A Watland Jr | Castlewood, SD 57223 | $34,546 |
74 | Larry Rust | Estelline, SD 57234 | $34,332 |
75 | Chad Douglas Noem | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $34,171 |
76 | Gene Harold Sauder | Bryant, SD 57221 | $34,065 |
77 | Ralph Schwartz | Estelline, SD 57234 | $33,953 |
78 | Dale & Mary Ann Williams Living Trust - Dale Willi | Estelline, SD 57234 | $33,844 |
79 | Rexford Schwartz | Bruce, SD 57220 | $33,513 |
80 | Wayne Sverre Thue | Hayti, SD 57241 | $33,268 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”