Farm Subsidy information
Hanson County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Hanson County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 403
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hanson County, South Dakota totaled $17,109,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Pamela Rae Wenande | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $33,704 |
42 | William Lingemann - William H Lingemann Rev Liv Tr | Ethan, SD 57334 | $33,417 |
43 | Robert Olinger | Emery, SD 57332 | $33,077 |
44 | David Robert Kayser | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $33,049 |
45 | Carmen O'neill | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $32,998 |
46 | Gregory Dwight Pullman | Emery, SD 57332 | $32,909 |
47 | Richard H Naser | Fulton, SD 57340 | $32,491 |
48 | Arthur Jarding Jr | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $32,008 |
49 | George Marquardt | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $31,860 |
50 | Sandy L Weeldreyer | Emery, SD 57332 | $31,484 |
51 | Matthew P Hofer | Fulton, SD 57340 | $31,204 |
52 | Don Pueppke | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $30,687 |
53 | Graves Farms Inc | Ethan, SD 57334 | $30,522 |
54 | Robert Henglefelt | Ethan, SD 57334 | $29,730 |
55 | Scott Dwayne Bender | Fulton, SD 57340 | $28,848 |
56 | Scott Lee Mcmanus | Fulton, SD 57340 | $28,732 |
57 | Wayne Matthew Roster | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $27,532 |
58 | D & L Moe Farms LLC | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $27,402 |
59 | Unke Lyons Inc | Salem, SD 57058 | $27,258 |
60 | Allen Tuschen | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $26,997 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”