Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Hanson County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 496
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Hanson County, South Dakota totaled $15,210,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Chris A Weber | Emery, SD 57332 | $94,717 |
42 | Brett T Doyle | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $94,074 |
43 | Scott Dwayne Bender | Fulton, SD 57340 | $92,739 |
44 | Victor Weber | Emery, SD 57332 | $92,405 |
45 | Michael James Roster | Spencer, SD 57374 | $91,156 |
46 | Glen Henglefelt | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $89,432 |
47 | Brian Lee Weber | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $88,255 |
48 | Rodney Huber | Fulton, SD 57340 | $84,603 |
49 | Gregory Bruce Roskens | Emery, SD 57332 | $84,415 |
50 | Jack Easton | Fulton, SD 57340 | $83,891 |
51 | David Fessler | Fulton, SD 57340 | $82,920 |
52 | First Dakota National Bank ** | Blunt, SD 57522 | $82,590 |
53 | David Bumgardner | Fulton, SD 57340 | $82,340 |
54 | Richard H Naser | Fulton, SD 57340 | $81,405 |
55 | Daniel E Olinger | Emery, SD 57332 | $79,843 |
56 | Gregory Kayser | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $78,277 |
57 | Dennis Lloyld Shelton | Spencer, SD 57374 | $77,660 |
58 | Derrin Miller | Spencer, SD 57374 | $77,488 |
59 | Danny Henry Roth | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $74,693 |
60 | Bleeker Enterprises Inc | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $74,352 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”