Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Hanson County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 154
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Hanson County, South Dakota totaled $181,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | William Lingemann - William H Lingemann Rev Liv Tr | Ethan, SD 57334 | $1,148 |
42 | Brian P Leitheiser | Emery, SD 57332 | $1,113 |
43 | Lyle Miller | Canova, SD 57321 | $1,099 |
44 | Scott Weber | Emery, SD 57332 | $1,053 |
45 | Bradley E Nesheim | Dimock, SD 57331 | $1,050 |
46 | Craig Tuschen | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $965 |
47 | Charles D Weber | Fulton, SD 57340 | $962 |
48 | Quinton Gene Patzlaff | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $942 |
49 | Kelly Endorf | Canova, SD 57321 | $938 |
50 | Richard Aulner | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $926 |
51 | Jared Nesheim | Ethan, SD 57334 | $905 |
52 | Rosedale Hutterian Brethren Incor | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $895 |
53 | Gregory Dwight Pullman | Emery, SD 57332 | $876 |
54 | David Bumgardner | Fulton, SD 57340 | $861 |
55 | Jacob Bender | Fulton, SD 57340 | $859 |
56 | Tristan Bender | Fulton, SD 57340 | $859 |
57 | James Pollreisz | Ethan, SD 57334 | $812 |
58 | Robert Olinger | Emery, SD 57332 | $790 |
59 | Donald J Henglefelt | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $779 |
60 | Terrance Lee Schroeder | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $761 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”