Farm Subsidy information
Hanson County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Hanson County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 401 to 420 of 1,489
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hanson County, South Dakota totaled $298,901,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
401 | Bruce Beier | Freeman, SD 57029 | $66,038 |
402 | Randall Brakke | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $65,927 |
403 | Ryan Douglas Guericke | Ethan, SD 57334 | $65,753 |
404 | Robert Olinger | Emery, SD 57332 | $65,141 |
405 | Harold George Brisbin | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $64,830 |
406 | Randy Berg | Emery, SD 57332 | $64,114 |
407 | David Louis Nebelsick | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $63,639 |
408 | Jerome Thelen | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $63,546 |
409 | William C Oberembt | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $63,093 |
410 | Donna R Shay | Sioux Falls, SD 57107 | $63,069 |
411 | Lloyd Kunkel | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $62,757 |
412 | Scott Goehring | Parkston, SD 57366 | $62,662 |
413 | Richard N Krier | Middleton, ID 83644 | $62,490 |
414 | Richard Naasz | Kimball, SD 57355 | $62,487 |
415 | Wilma Heckel Grunewaldt | Ethan, SD 57334 | $61,978 |
416 | Mark Schaefers | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $61,942 |
417 | Ralph W Lyman | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $61,867 |
418 | Joann Smith | Marion, SD 57043 | $60,369 |
419 | Lawrence N Roster | Spencer, SD 57374 | $60,142 |
420 | James J Fauth | Victoria, TX 77904 | $59,986 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”