Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Hanson County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 496
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Hanson County, South Dakota totaled $15,210,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Michael Merle Schock | Spencer, SD 57374 | $38,779 |
122 | Leroy Nickolas Schaefers | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $38,586 |
123 | Susan Marie Tilberg | Ethan, SD 57334 | $37,972 |
124 | Raymond Scheuren | Spencer, SD 57374 | $37,910 |
125 | Kevin Roland Schnabel | Emery, SD 57332 | $37,748 |
126 | Corey Allen Degen | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $37,128 |
127 | Richard Edgar Dewald | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $36,883 |
128 | Chris Tuschen | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $36,623 |
129 | Michael G Wethor | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $36,221 |
130 | Cedar Lane Farms Inc | Emery, SD 57332 | $36,148 |
131 | Allen Tuschen | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $35,663 |
132 | Dennis Wayne Decker | Parkston, SD 57366 | $34,905 |
133 | Mcentee Farms LLC | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $34,399 |
134 | Leonard Berg | Emery, SD 57332 | $34,377 |
135 | Cyril Charles Haag | Fulton, SD 57340 | $34,199 |
136 | Riggs Bros Inc | Ethan, SD 57334 | $34,060 |
137 | Roland Alvin Schnabel | Emery, SD 57332 | $34,004 |
138 | Richard Lee Weber | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $33,836 |
139 | Steve D Repenning | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $33,687 |
140 | David A Ditter | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $33,664 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”