Conservation Reserve Program in Hughes County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 132
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Hughes County, South Dakota totaled $919,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dbm Properties LLC | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $6,873 |
42 | Leslie J Stewart | Pierre, SD 57501 | $6,582 |
43 | Susan R Stewart | Pierre, SD 57501 | $6,582 |
44 | Marlys Becker | Pierre, SD 57501 | $6,365 |
45 | Allen Garber | Pierre, SD 57501 | $6,018 |
46 | Donna L Jensen | White River, SD 57579 | $5,966 |
47 | Ljc Acres, LLC | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $5,622 |
48 | Roger Inman | Pierre, SD 57501 | $5,305 |
49 | David Spaid | Pierre, SD 57501 | $5,134 |
50 | Gladys G Irion Living Trust | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $4,914 |
51 | First National Bank ** | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $4,635 |
52 | Jon C And Theresa Beastrom Jv | Pierre, SD 57501 | $4,490 |
53 | Larry D Howard | Pierre, SD 57501 | $4,433 |
54 | Broken Arrow Farms | Pierre, SD 57501 | $4,150 |
55 | Chad Howard | Pierre, SD 57501 | $3,885 |
56 | Eric Monson | Pierre, SD 57501 | $3,847 |
57 | Mathew W Lebrun | Pierre, SD 57501 | $3,807 |
58 | Joseph W Peschel | Phillips, NE 68865 | $3,674 |
59 | Nancy Nielsen-peschel | Phillips, NE 68865 | $3,674 |
60 | Phyllis L Lair | College Station, TX 77845 | $3,566 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”