Farm Subsidy information
Hughes County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Hughes County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 369
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hughes County, South Dakota totaled $16,160,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | North Ridge Ranch Inc | Pierre, SD 57501 | $4,929 |
182 | Gladys G Irion Living Trust | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $4,914 |
183 | Severson Drilling LLC | Pierre, SD 57501 | $4,761 |
184 | Scott Pazour | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $4,749 |
185 | Russell Spaid | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $4,647 |
186 | Quincy Johnston Inc | Pierre, SD 57501 | $4,642 |
187 | First National Bank ** | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $4,635 |
188 | Jcb Farms Limited Partnership | Lakeville, MN 55044 | $4,610 |
189 | Katherine Porter | Highmore, SD 57345 | $4,609 |
190 | Dakota Lakes Research Farm Inc | Pierre, SD 57501 | $4,451 |
191 | Larry D Howard | Pierre, SD 57501 | $4,433 |
192 | Michael J Blume | Pierre, SD 57501 | $4,432 |
193 | Broken Arrow Farms | Pierre, SD 57501 | $4,266 |
194 | Wyatt William Leesman | Blunt, SD 57522 | $4,247 |
195 | Peoria Flats Cattle Company | Pierre, SD 57501 | $4,106 |
196 | Mike Ogan | Pierre, SD 57501 | $4,052 |
197 | David Hobert | Harrold, SD 57536 | $3,947 |
198 | Chad Howard | Pierre, SD 57501 | $3,885 |
199 | Randy Brown | Porter, MN 56280 | $3,881 |
200 | Skyler Leesman | Pierre, SD 57501 | $3,866 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”