Loan Deficiency in Hughes County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 387
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Hughes County, South Dakota totaled $13,825,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lynn Metzinger | Pierre, SD 57501 | $139,296 |
22 | Quincy Johnston Inc | Mountain View, CA 94040 | $137,574 |
23 | Finley Farming Inc | Blunt, SD 57522 | $137,482 |
24 | Robert Dale Hattum | Harrold, SD 57536 | $130,646 |
25 | Travis Smith | Harrold, SD 57536 | $129,994 |
26 | Jerry W Hawkins | Pierre, SD 57501 | $128,966 |
27 | Sheryl J Hawkins | Pierre, SD 57501 | $127,732 |
28 | Mccarty Farms Inc | Pierre, SD 57501 | $126,661 |
29 | Dennis Haven | Brentford, SD 57429 | $126,174 |
30 | H J And Ma Downes And Sons | Carlsbad, CA 92011 | $124,651 |
31 | Robert Mark Garber | Pierre, SD 57501 | $124,605 |
32 | Brad L Bonhorst | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $124,308 |
33 | Paul Rae Farms Inc | Pierre, SD 57501 | $121,895 |
34 | P E C Family Limited Partnership | Oklahoma City, OK 73120 | $117,180 |
35 | Jones Family Land Ltd Partnership | Harrold, SD 57536 | $111,004 |
36 | James F Schumacher | Pierre, SD 57501 | $109,810 |
37 | Sheldon P Reding Living Trust | Harrold, SD 57536 | $108,131 |
38 | Dusty Acres Ranch | Harrold, SD 57536 | $101,965 |
39 | Nystrom Brothers Corporation | Pierre, SD 57501 | $101,927 |
40 | Ed Ravnaas | Harrold, SD 57536 | $96,934 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”