Conservation Reserve Program in Hutchinson County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 443
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Hutchinson County, South Dakota totaled $2,702,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Michael Muntefering | Dimock, SD 57331 | $16,787 |
42 | Vernetta Schulz | Parkston, SD 57366 | $16,696 |
43 | Marvin Baumiller Revocable Trust - Marvin Baumille | Parkston, SD 57366 | $16,293 |
44 | Elda Zeeb | Menno, SD 57045 | $16,235 |
45 | Steven Walz | Parkston, SD 57366 | $16,209 |
46 | Larry E Stern | Freeman, SD 57029 | $16,139 |
47 | Albert J Binder & Virginia P Binder Trust | Yankton, SD 57078 | $15,814 |
48 | Harvey Hanselman | Ethan, SD 57334 | $15,788 |
49 | Lorraine Kummer | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $15,749 |
50 | Howard Knodel | Menno, SD 57045 | $15,689 |
51 | Florence Rokusek | Freeman, SD 57029 | $15,451 |
52 | Reuben Nicolai Revocable Trust | La Crosse, WI 54601 | $15,196 |
53 | Berniece H Bialas Trust | Parkston, SD 57366 | $15,053 |
54 | Barbara J Heth Trust | Mckinney, TX 75070 | $14,829 |
55 | Winter Family Irrevocable Real Estate Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $14,824 |
56 | Jody M Scott | Parkston, SD 57366 | $14,661 |
57 | Jenny K Leischner | Parkston, SD 57366 | $14,657 |
58 | Tammy J Tjaden | Dell Rapids, SD 57022 | $14,657 |
59 | Charles Conrad II | Olivet, SD 57052 | $14,433 |
60 | Sandra Dewald | Yankton, SD 57078 | $14,300 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”