Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Hutchinson County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 39
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Hutchinson County, South Dakota totaled $89,724 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Stacy Rochelle Gross | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $22,959 |
2 | Daren Josh Lindeman | Parkston, SD 57366 | $7,081 |
3 | Kyle Dean Mogck | Olivet, SD 57052 | $5,639 |
4 | Dexter Alan Grosz | Olivet, SD 57052 | $5,205 |
5 | Caleb Alan Preszler | Menno, SD 57045 | $5,017 |
6 | David Michael Hoff | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $4,806 |
7 | Mrs Alma Louise Lindeman | Parkston, SD 57366 | $3,871 |
8 | , | $3,170 | |
9 | Dylan Douglas Lindeman | Parkston, SD 57366 | $3,163 |
10 | George Alvin Eich | Salem, SD 57058 | $3,015 |
11 | Tyler Jarrod Watembach | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $2,751 |
12 | Evan Kent Wintersteen | Olivet, SD 57052 | $2,465 |
13 | Timothy Earl Zeeb | Menno, SD 57045 | $2,055 |
14 | , | $1,949 | |
15 | Adam Dean Kafka | Parkston, SD 57366 | $1,862 |
16 | Kyle Schnabel | Tripp, SD 57376 | $1,709 |
17 | Jeffrey Lincoln Harris | Parkston, SD 57366 | $1,438 |
18 | Tanner Jaye Suess | Tripp, SD 57376 | $1,264 |
19 | Jonathan J Thomas | Duvall, WA 98019 | $1,198 |
20 | Scott Allen Roth | Parkston, SD 57366 | $956 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>