Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Hyde County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 339
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Hyde County, South Dakota totaled $8,577,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Ryan A Rittel | Highmore, SD 57345 | $7,514 |
162 | Michael Meyer | Harrold, SD 57536 | $7,318 |
163 | Pandy Rezac | Highmore, SD 57345 | $7,261 |
164 | Tkf Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $7,255 |
165 | Matthew Gordon Jones | Miller, SD 57362 | $7,219 |
166 | Deborah Hyde | Harrold, SD 57536 | $7,208 |
167 | Lenny Peterson | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $7,085 |
168 | Robert V Stephenson | Highmore, SD 57345 | $7,068 |
169 | Xavier Paul Schlechter | Orient, SD 57467 | $7,031 |
170 | Durward Ratzlaff | Highmore, SD 57345 | $6,913 |
171 | Jacob Robert Schlechter | Orient, SD 57467 | $6,824 |
172 | Johnathon Schlechter | Orient, SD 57467 | $6,824 |
173 | Gary Haiwick | Highmore, SD 57345 | $6,810 |
174 | Rod Fieldsend | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $6,800 |
175 | Chelsea Meyer | Harrold, SD 57536 | $6,793 |
176 | Wurts Family LLC | Highmore, SD 57345 | $6,713 |
177 | Volek Ranch LLC | Highmore, SD 57345 | $6,487 |
178 | Virginia Cermak | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $6,469 |
179 | Doug Kroeplin Farms LLC | Highmore, SD 57345 | $6,382 |
180 | Matthew Buhler | Onida, SD 57564 | $6,374 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”