Farm Subsidy information
Hyde County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Hyde County, South Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 343
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hyde County, South Dakota totaled $21,989,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Lance J Schulz | Highmore, SD 57345 | $175,025 |
22 | Donald W Binder | Highmore, SD 57345 | $169,441 |
23 | Charlie Bloomenrader | Highmore, SD 57345 | $162,161 |
24 | Jeff Ellsworth | Highmore, SD 57345 | $160,317 |
25 | Troy Baloun | Highmore, SD 57345 | $149,816 |
26 | Randall Hague - Randall M Hague Living Trust | Highmore, SD 57345 | $146,196 |
27 | Weidenbach Ranch | Highmore, SD 57345 | $142,369 |
28 | L & L Weber Trust | Seneca, SD 57473 | $139,062 |
29 | Jason Pekarek | Highmore, SD 57345 | $136,975 |
30 | Pompadour Hills Ranch LLC | Highmore, SD 57345 | $136,847 |
31 | Mark Mccloud | Highmore, SD 57345 | $134,847 |
32 | Terry Spilde Living Trust | Highmore, SD 57345 | $130,606 |
33 | Jesse A Knox | Holabird, SD 57540 | $126,390 |
34 | Kenneth L Branine | Holabird, SD 57540 | $114,921 |
35 | Ronald R Pekarek Trust | Highmore, SD 57345 | $111,914 |
36 | Cody Baloun | Highmore, SD 57345 | $107,025 |
37 | Clement Ranch LLC | Highmore, SD 57345 | $106,713 |
38 | Larry & Sandra Aesoph Revocable Trust | Highmore, SD 57345 | $105,036 |
39 | Steve Jessen | Harrold, SD 57536 | $104,067 |
40 | Aesoph Ranch | Highmore, SD 57345 | $94,221 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”