Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Jackson County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 363
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Jackson County, South Dakota totaled $20,172,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jimmy Wheeler | Philip, SD 57567 | $70,585 |
102 | Patrick Solon | Kadoka, SD 57543 | $70,075 |
103 | Robert C Ellsworth | Fort Thompson, SD 57339 | $67,951 |
104 | Kathleen Ellsworth | Fort Thompson, SD 57339 | $67,951 |
105 | Norman Amiotte | Interior, SD 57750 | $67,802 |
106 | Susan Patterson | Kadoka, SD 57543 | $65,909 |
107 | Scott W Huether | Interior, SD 57750 | $65,888 |
108 | Grant Patterson | Kadoka, SD 57543 | $65,626 |
109 | Bonenberger Ranch Inc | Belvidere, SD 57521 | $65,440 |
110 | Jeramy Jason Ward | Martin, SD 57551 | $64,580 |
111 | Hamar Ranch LLC | Long Valley, SD 57547 | $64,067 |
112 | John P Neumann Irrv Tr | Philip, SD 57567 | $63,366 |
113 | Stromberger Farms Inc | Imperial, NE 69033 | $63,361 |
114 | Jack Brunsch | Norris, SD 57560 | $62,855 |
115 | Thomas L O'rourke | Interior, SD 57750 | $61,973 |
116 | Sterling Riggins | Hermosa, SD 57744 | $61,064 |
117 | Dennis Sharp | Interior, SD 57750 | $60,867 |
118 | Mike Vaughn | Kyle, SD 57752 | $60,301 |
119 | Marcia Huether | Interior, SD 57750 | $60,258 |
120 | James Herber | Kadoka, SD 57543 | $60,021 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”