Total Conservation Programs in Jerauld County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 421 to 440 of 556
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Jerauld County, South Dakota totaled $21,154,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
421 | Richard Douglas Ward | Menomonee Fls, WI 53051 | $3,552 |
422 | Roger E Schimke Estate | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $3,500 |
423 | Karl Swanson | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $3,456 |
424 | Douglas Howard Jones | Alpena, SD 57312 | $3,393 |
425 | , | $3,380 | |
426 | Chris Christensen | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $3,306 |
427 | Rachel Crist | Gering, NE 69341 | $3,282 |
428 | Thomas R Olsen Living Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $3,269 |
429 | Mary H Tieszen Trust | Canistota, SD 57012 | $3,163 |
430 | Tom R Brisbine Jr Testamentary Tr | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $3,120 |
431 | A L Korkow | Huron, SD 57350 | $3,024 |
432 | Ronald T Thompson | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $2,947 |
433 | Pheasant Crest Lodge Inc | Kimball, SD 57355 | $2,895 |
434 | Zane Gray | Hot Springs, SD 57747 | $2,853 |
435 | Terry Seeman | Watertown, SD 57201 | $2,850 |
436 | Scott Seeman | Mound, MN 55364 | $2,850 |
437 | Susan Lynn Ogren | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $2,832 |
438 | Robert V Shultz | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $2,748 |
439 | E.f. Dorn | Edina, MN 55424 | $2,684 |
440 | Judith Heslin | Scottsdale, AZ 85255 | $2,684 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”