Farm Subsidy information
Jerauld County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Jerauld County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 353
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jerauld County, South Dakota totaled $10,806,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $273,802 |
| 2 | Patrick Hoarty | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $241,739 |
| 3 | John Olinger | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $190,711 |
| 4 | Al Meier | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $149,326 |
| 5 | Mara Meier | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $149,326 |
| 6 | Kylan Meier | Alpena, SD 57312 | $140,461 |
| 7 | Ashley Meier | Alpena, SD 57312 | $140,461 |
| 8 | Feistner Farms Llp | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $134,980 |
| 9 | Kolousek Farms Inc | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $130,877 |
| 10 | Olinger Farms Partnership | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $128,473 |
| 11 | Spring Valley Hutterian Brethren Inc | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $97,810 |
| 12 | Todd Olinger | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $93,380 |
| 13 | Grohs Farms Partnership | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $83,167 |
| 14 | Russell Krumvieda | White Lake, SD 57383 | $82,412 |
| 15 | Brian Havlik | Kimball, SD 57355 | $80,795 |
| 16 | Van Dyke Farms Inc | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $66,522 |
| 17 | Clayton Wenzel | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $64,625 |
| 18 | Robert L Hine Inc | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $64,294 |
| 19 | David Russell Salmen Rev Lvg Trust | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $61,225 |
| 20 | Philip L Wipf | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $53,381 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf