Market Gains in Jerauld County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 44
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Jerauld County, South Dakota totaled $1,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Swenson Partnership | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $376,276 |
2 | S & S Farms | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $105,444 |
3 | Spring Valley Hutterian Brethren Inc | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $98,806 |
4 | Al Meier | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $79,783 |
5 | Roger Hainy | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $37,984 |
6 | Royce Vanbockern | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $37,705 |
7 | Kylan Meier | Alpena, SD 57312 | $29,279 |
8 | Norfeld Hutterian Brethren | White, SD 57276 | $24,664 |
9 | Dennis Feistner | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $21,915 |
10 | Curt Olinger | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $21,801 |
11 | Broken Heart Ranch Inc | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $20,867 |
12 | Fred D Krohmer | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $18,661 |
13 | Roger Cudmore | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $16,391 |
14 | Firesteel Rch Corp | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $15,248 |
15 | Dennis & Sandra Mceldowney Living Trust | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $10,081 |
16 | Bradley Steichen | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $9,302 |
17 | Steve Jackson | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $7,626 |
18 | Timothy Jackson | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $7,626 |
19 | Bruce Kogel | Woonsocket, SD 57385 | $6,566 |
20 | Lloyd Lutter | Gann Valley, SD 57341 | $6,414 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>