Farm Subsidy information
Jones County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Jones County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 231
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jones County, South Dakota totaled $12,770,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Darrell Iversen | Murdo, SD 57559 | $98,881 |
22 | Rankin & Sons Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $95,546 |
23 | Circle C Farms, Inc | Doon, IA 51235 | $93,359 |
24 | Glen Alan Iversen | Murdo, SD 57559 | $90,140 |
25 | Michael E Barnes | Murdo, SD 57559 | $78,823 |
26 | Hartland Farms Inc | Ainsworth, NE 69210 | $74,930 |
27 | Kelly Dale Kinsley | Murdo, SD 57559 | $74,898 |
28 | Jacob Mathews | Midland, SD 57552 | $73,933 |
29 | Lon Peters | Murdo, SD 57559 | $73,165 |
30 | Christopher J Iversen | Murdo, SD 57559 | $70,578 |
31 | Sherri Elizabeth Vander Schaaf | Okaton, SD 57562 | $69,960 |
32 | Bork & Sons, Inc | Okaton, SD 57562 | $67,537 |
33 | Okaton Partners | Rapid City, SD 57709 | $66,687 |
34 | Kevin Clemens Meyers | Draper, SD 57531 | $66,509 |
35 | Troy Clinton Iversen | Murdo, SD 57559 | $65,512 |
36 | Nathan Wade Vander Schaaf | Okaton, SD 57562 | $64,621 |
37 | , | $63,272 | |
38 | Michael Allen Livermont II | Murdo, SD 57559 | $61,493 |
39 | Robert Fuoss Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $61,258 |
40 | Dean William Volmer | Draper, SD 57531 | $61,053 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”