Farm Subsidy information
Jones County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Jones County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 832
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jones County, South Dakota totaled $148,099,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Charles Michael Baker | Murdo, SD 57559 | $2,992,901 |
2 | Sj Dowling Farms Partnership | Draper, SD 57531 | $2,799,265 |
3 | Edk Farms | Murdo, SD 57559 | $2,262,021 |
4 | Sj Dowling Partnership | Draper, SD 57531 | $2,108,099 |
5 | Louder Farms Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $2,105,086 |
6 | Fuoss Angus Ranch Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $2,064,598 |
7 | Mack Wyly | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $2,026,641 |
8 | Karen Wyly | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $1,993,795 |
9 | Miller-mathews Partnership | Midland, SD 57552 | $1,948,800 |
10 | Rankin & Sons Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $1,840,517 |
11 | Curtis Ray Miller | Draper, SD 57531 | $1,451,231 |
12 | Scott Philip Mathews | Draper, SD 57531 | $1,324,903 |
13 | Paul Darcy Patterson | Draper, SD 57531 | $1,281,725 |
14 | Philip Gerald Mathews | Draper, SD 57531 | $1,276,617 |
15 | Kevin Clemens Meyers | Draper, SD 57531 | $1,174,041 |
16 | Kenneth Raymond Miller | Draper, SD 57531 | $1,033,501 |
17 | Roy Iversen | Murdo, SD 57559 | $1,032,100 |
18 | T J Farms Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $1,031,121 |
19 | Cory J Rust | Okaton, SD 57562 | $1,003,332 |
20 | Robert Fuoss Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $996,928 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>