Farm Subsidy information
Jones County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Jones County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 268
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jones County, South Dakota totaled $10,241,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mack Wyly | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $84,167 |
22 | Karen Wyly | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $84,143 |
23 | Robert Fuoss Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $83,513 |
24 | Christopher J Iversen | Murdo, SD 57559 | $79,975 |
25 | Philip R Mathews | Draper, SD 57531 | $77,018 |
26 | Kevin Clemens Meyers | Draper, SD 57531 | $72,129 |
27 | Aaron Iversen | Murdo, SD 57559 | $71,351 |
28 | Michael E Barnes | Murdo, SD 57559 | $69,525 |
29 | Valburg Limited Partnership | Draper, SD 57531 | $69,104 |
30 | Circle C Farms, Inc | Doon, IA 51235 | $67,599 |
31 | Dean William Volmer | Draper, SD 57531 | $66,454 |
32 | Curtis Ray Miller | Draper, SD 57531 | $65,980 |
33 | Brittany Teresa Dowling | Pierre, SD 57501 | $65,613 |
34 | Michael David Fuoss | Draper, SD 57531 | $63,547 |
35 | Philip Gerald Mathews | Draper, SD 57531 | $62,034 |
36 | Skyler Scott Dowling | Pierre, SD 57501 | $61,087 |
37 | Lon Peters | Murdo, SD 57559 | $58,909 |
38 | Glen Alan Iversen | Murdo, SD 57559 | $57,073 |
39 | Marty Mel Roghair | Okaton, SD 57562 | $55,233 |
40 | Nathan Wade Vander Schaaf | Okaton, SD 57562 | $52,674 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”