Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Jones County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 123
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Jones County, South Dakota totaled $1,821,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Miller-mathews Partnership | Midland, SD 57552 | $234,780 |
2 | Lcl Ranch Inc | Murdo, SD 57559 | $88,056 |
3 | Fuoss Angus Ranch Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $69,055 |
4 | Cory J Rust | Okaton, SD 57562 | $65,640 |
5 | Chad Eldon Whitney | Murdo, SD 57559 | $57,779 |
6 | Del A Brost | Murdo, SD 57559 | $50,874 |
7 | Brett Richard Nix | Murdo, SD 57559 | $49,929 |
8 | Scott Philip Mathews | Draper, SD 57531 | $40,437 |
9 | Roy Iversen | Murdo, SD 57559 | $39,117 |
10 | Dahlkes Ranch | Murdo, SD 57559 | $37,842 |
11 | Karen Wyly | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $37,627 |
12 | Kelly Dale Kinsley | Murdo, SD 57559 | $35,958 |
13 | Christopher J Iversen | Murdo, SD 57559 | $32,475 |
14 | Mack Wyly | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $31,356 |
15 | Valburg Limited Partnership | Draper, SD 57531 | $30,669 |
16 | Rankin & Sons Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $27,726 |
17 | Aaron Iversen | Murdo, SD 57559 | $27,060 |
18 | Philip R Mathews | Draper, SD 57531 | $25,970 |
19 | Louder Farms Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $21,636 |
20 | Michael E Barnes | Murdo, SD 57559 | $20,049 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>