Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 207
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $1,164,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Peckenpaugh | Carthage, SD 57323 | $12,470 |
22 | Bryan Sneesby | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $12,240 |
23 | Richard Clayton Abrahamson | Oldham, SD 57051 | $11,379 |
24 | Emil Larsen | De Smet, SD 57231 | $11,304 |
25 | H T Albrecht & Sons Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $11,013 |
26 | Norman Madison | Carthage, SD 57323 | $10,126 |
27 | Randy Lee Nelson | Carpenter, SD 57322 | $9,690 |
28 | Leroy Koehlmoos | De Smet, SD 57231 | $9,026 |
29 | Jordan Paul Meyer | Cavour, SD 57324 | $8,855 |
30 | Poppen Farms Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $8,838 |
31 | Nicholas Todd Wilkinson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $8,747 |
32 | Jeanne Marie Gruenhagen | De Smet, SD 57231 | $8,623 |
33 | William Lee Rydbom | De Smet, SD 57231 | $8,553 |
34 | Alan J Vedvei | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $8,487 |
35 | Bruce Penner | De Smet, SD 57231 | $8,091 |
36 | Robert And Joanne Mcadaragh Revoc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $7,944 |
37 | Tommy Ray Wallum | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $7,916 |
38 | Greg Penner | De Smet, SD 57231 | $7,785 |
39 | Samuel Geyer | De Smet, SD 57231 | $6,809 |
40 | Douglas Robert Fox | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $6,804 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”