Farm Subsidy information
Kingsbury County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 533
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $20,227,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Megan Eichler | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $35,907 |
22 | Plainview Farm | Brookings, SD 57006 | $35,684 |
23 | Judd D Fox | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $34,164 |
24 | Jason Bowes | De Smet, SD 57231 | $33,085 |
25 | Robert Timp | De Smet, SD 57231 | $32,120 |
26 | Brodersen Living Trust | De Smet, SD 57231 | $31,850 |
27 | Tommy Ray Wallum | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $31,728 |
28 | Mark Ely Johnson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $31,287 |
29 | Rick Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $30,544 |
30 | Timothy Brown | Madison, SD 57042 | $30,320 |
31 | Infinite Horizon Farms LLC | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $30,119 |
32 | Merlin Voorhees | Onida, SD 57564 | $29,934 |
33 | Chad Alan Murphy | Arlington, SD 57212 | $29,119 |
34 | Virchow Farms LLC | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $28,625 |
35 | Douglas Robert Fox | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $28,490 |
36 | Jeffry Gruenhagen | De Smet, SD 57231 | $28,430 |
37 | Roger G Lee | De Smet, SD 57231 | $28,409 |
38 | Hi Spirit Ranch Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $28,136 |
39 | Paul S Vaughan II | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $27,442 |
40 | , | $26,389 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”