Total Emergency Relief Program in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 316
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $7,031,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jeffrey Emil Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $119,123 |
22 | Steven J Duffy | Oldham, SD 57051 | $116,771 |
23 | Roger Lee Walls | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $114,284 |
24 | H T Albrecht & Sons Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $112,686 |
25 | Hillview Farm Inc | Oldham, SD 57051 | $104,471 |
26 | Fast View Farms | Huron, SD 57350 | $104,119 |
27 | Shamrock Farms Inc %j Huntimer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $89,342 |
28 | Rodney Ray Yost | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $73,269 |
29 | Steven Frank Palmer | De Smet, SD 57231 | $71,393 |
30 | Robert Peckenpaugh | Carthage, SD 57323 | $69,997 |
31 | Page Brothers | De Smet, SD 57231 | $66,819 |
32 | Roger G Lee | De Smet, SD 57231 | $65,317 |
33 | Mark Ely Johnson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $63,245 |
34 | Jared Joseph Tolzin | De Smet, SD 57231 | $62,142 |
35 | Jeffrey Madison | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $60,743 |
36 | Mark Richard Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $59,370 |
37 | Gale Cecil Larson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $57,878 |
38 | Hoff Farm Inc | Arlington, SD 57212 | $53,585 |
39 | Bennie Widman | De Smet, SD 57231 | $49,271 |
40 | John Coughlin | De Smet, SD 57231 | $45,743 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”