Total Commodity Programs in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 60
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $522,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Eugene Steffensen | De Smet, SD 57231 | $7,560 |
22 | Troy A Nelson | Erwin, SD 57233 | $6,747 |
23 | Pleasant Hill Farm | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $6,607 |
24 | Tyler Nelson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $6,151 |
25 | John Marvin Goebel Jr | Oldham, SD 57051 | $5,239 |
26 | Michael E Unke | Salem, SD 57058 | $4,781 |
27 | Roger Hoyer | Arlington, SD 57212 | $4,496 |
28 | Unke Inc | Salem, SD 57058 | $4,350 |
29 | Chad Hoyer | Arlington, SD 57212 | $4,104 |
30 | Brandon Arthur Doyle | Erwin, SD 57233 | $4,082 |
31 | Steven Trey Wipf | De Smet, SD 57231 | $4,012 |
32 | Robert Timp | De Smet, SD 57231 | $3,644 |
33 | Nicholas Todd Wilkinson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $3,424 |
34 | Timothy Martin Steffensen | De Smet, SD 57231 | $3,339 |
35 | Rj Partnership | De Smet, SD 57231 | $3,143 |
36 | Bradley Steffensen | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $2,589 |
37 | Keaton Douglas Hoyer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $2,495 |
38 | , | $2,494 | |
39 | Nancy Jeske Trust | Melrose, MN 56352 | $2,455 |
40 | Richard M Converse | Arlington, SD 57212 | $2,257 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”