Farm Subsidy information
Kingsbury County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 321 to 340 of 2,373
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $483,482,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
321 | Gary Lee Akkerman | De Smet, SD 57231 | $209,469 |
322 | Bradley Steffensen | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $208,066 |
323 | Nancy Jeske Trust | Melrose, MN 56352 | $207,082 |
324 | Gary W Edman | Arlington, SD 57212 | $206,666 |
325 | Warne-pommer Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $206,108 |
326 | Todd Henry Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $204,784 |
327 | Lyle F Gehm | De Smet, SD 57231 | $203,616 |
328 | Odegaard Farms | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $203,196 |
329 | James A Ogren | De Smet, SD 57231 | $202,971 |
330 | Arlo Iver Carlson | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $202,932 |
331 | Aaron Poppen | De Smet, SD 57231 | $202,780 |
332 | Gene Stegeman | Brookings, SD 57006 | $200,866 |
333 | David Green | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $200,823 |
334 | Eldon Smith | Arlington, SD 57212 | $199,544 |
335 | David G Wolkow | Erwin, SD 57233 | $199,528 |
336 | Richard M Converse | Arlington, SD 57212 | $198,287 |
337 | Robert B Lee | De Smet, SD 57231 | $196,510 |
338 | Norma Rabenberg | De Smet, SD 57231 | $196,088 |
339 | Dale Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $195,941 |
340 | Rodney Dean Josephsen | Arlington, SD 57212 | $195,732 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”