Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 371
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $9,776,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Steven Lyle Page | De Smet, SD 57231 | $49,004 |
42 | John Coughlin | De Smet, SD 57231 | $47,071 |
43 | Jacobsen Farms Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $46,207 |
44 | Neil Palmer Rommereim | De Smet, SD 57231 | $45,913 |
45 | Alan J Vedvei | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $45,401 |
46 | Rustin E Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $44,903 |
47 | Norman Madison | Carthage, SD 57323 | $44,704 |
48 | Bradley John Albrecht | Arlington, SD 57212 | $44,425 |
49 | Gregory Scott Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $44,425 |
50 | Jeffrey Emil Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $44,425 |
51 | Jon Charles Albrecht | Howard, SD 57349 | $44,425 |
52 | Robert Timp | De Smet, SD 57231 | $44,257 |
53 | William T Driscoll | De Smet, SD 57231 | $41,233 |
54 | Matthew Peckenpaugh | Carthage, SD 57323 | $40,495 |
55 | Leroy Koehlmoos | De Smet, SD 57231 | $40,083 |
56 | Brady Larsen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $39,696 |
57 | Megan Eichler | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $37,445 |
58 | Anthony Peckenpaugh | Carthage, SD 57323 | $36,477 |
59 | Allan Rieck | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $34,740 |
60 | Matthew Lee Palmlund | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $34,625 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”