Deficiency Payment in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 930
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $2,705,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Wesley C Jones | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $11,737 |
42 | George Christensen | Badger, SD 57214 | $11,529 |
43 | Jerome Joe Gruenhagen | De Smet, SD 57231 | $11,355 |
44 | Stolpe Brothers | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $11,340 |
45 | Eugene Douglas Peckenpaugh | Carthage, SD 57323 | $11,338 |
46 | Arlyn D Jensen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $11,324 |
47 | Odegaard Ranch | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $11,246 |
48 | Farrel Jacobsen | Badger, SD 57214 | $11,111 |
49 | Warren Arthur Casper | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $10,943 |
50 | Wayne Kuehn | Arlington, SD 57212 | $10,873 |
51 | Marvin Tolzin | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $10,614 |
52 | William Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $10,449 |
53 | Shamrock Farms Inc %j Huntimer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $10,378 |
54 | Bennie Widman | De Smet, SD 57231 | $10,356 |
55 | Daniel Fox | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $10,269 |
56 | Glen Hassebroek | De Smet, SD 57231 | $10,164 |
57 | Russell Everette Schultz | Arlington, SD 57212 | $10,101 |
58 | D & B Cattle Co | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $10,091 |
59 | Douglas Robert Fox | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $10,027 |
60 | Mark Ely Johnson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $9,933 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”