Total Emergency Relief Program in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 316
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $7,031,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mark Eldon Jensen | Badger, SD 57214 | $43,077 |
42 | William T Driscoll | De Smet, SD 57231 | $42,378 |
43 | Donna Marie Boyd | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $42,132 |
44 | Lloyd Boyd | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $41,263 |
45 | Stephan John Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $41,240 |
46 | Frank E Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $39,353 |
47 | Neil Palmer Rommereim | De Smet, SD 57231 | $38,288 |
48 | Brian Driscoll | De Smet, SD 57231 | $37,872 |
49 | Alden Dennis Boyd | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $36,636 |
50 | Garrett Tanner Osvog | De Smet, SD 57231 | $36,370 |
51 | Brian Dale Christensen | Arlington, SD 57212 | $36,344 |
52 | Cynthia Louise Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $35,158 |
53 | Spring Lake Colony | Arlington, SD 57212 | $34,838 |
54 | Loren H Haufschild | Oldham, SD 57051 | $34,679 |
55 | Jody Alan Weiss | Hetland, SD 57212 | $34,375 |
56 | Anthony Peckenpaugh | Carthage, SD 57323 | $34,328 |
57 | Bryson Ensz | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $34,162 |
58 | Gary Osvog | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $33,386 |
59 | Curt Wehlander | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $32,341 |
60 | , | $32,267 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”