Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 138
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $1,052,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jeffrey Madison | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $3,899 |
42 | Terry Alan Schoenfelder | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $3,852 |
43 | Phillip Austerman & Thad Austerman | Artesian, SD 57314 | $3,299 |
44 | Steven Palmlund | De Smet, SD 57231 | $3,298 |
45 | Neil L Palmlund | De Smet, SD 57231 | $3,298 |
46 | James H Jensen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $3,186 |
47 | Paige Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $3,063 |
48 | Brooke Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $3,063 |
49 | John E Madison | Huron, SD 57350 | $2,952 |
50 | Norman Ernest Koehlmoos | De Smet, SD 57231 | $2,886 |
51 | Tyler Nelson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $2,600 |
52 | Steven Frank Palmer | De Smet, SD 57231 | $2,584 |
53 | Brady Larsen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $2,494 |
54 | Wade Jensen | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $1,934 |
55 | Jeffrey Eschenbaum | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,852 |
56 | Tracy Eggleston | Willow Lake, SD 57278 | $1,783 |
57 | Lance Lee | De Smet, SD 57231 | $1,775 |
58 | Kyle Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,715 |
59 | Robert Montross | De Smet, SD 57231 | $1,672 |
60 | Hojer Ranch LLC | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,646 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”