Oilseed Program in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 684
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $2,652,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Daniel Fox | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $9,746 |
62 | Hi Spirit Ranch Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $9,682 |
63 | Sheldon Royal Stewart | Brookings, SD 57006 | $9,658 |
64 | Donald Scott Dejong | Huron, SD 57350 | $9,655 |
65 | Gary L Miller | Arlington, SD 57212 | $9,620 |
66 | Arlie Dean Ellingson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $9,346 |
67 | Steven Ust | Brookings, SD 57006 | $9,338 |
68 | Richard And W Jean Syverson Family Living Trust | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $9,261 |
69 | Mc Garvie Brothers | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $9,235 |
70 | Shamrock Farms Inc %j Huntimer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $9,185 |
71 | Russell Everette Schultz | Arlington, SD 57212 | $9,144 |
72 | Daniel Leroy Tolzin | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $9,027 |
73 | Gullickson Cattle Company Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $8,855 |
74 | Mark Eldon Jensen | Badger, SD 57214 | $8,773 |
75 | Warne-pommer Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $8,739 |
76 | Dale Clifford Leonhardt | Oldham, SD 57051 | $8,677 |
77 | Jensen Double J Farms | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $8,609 |
78 | Neil Palmer Rommereim | De Smet, SD 57231 | $8,570 |
79 | Eugene Steffensen | De Smet, SD 57231 | $8,494 |
80 | Duane Erving Hojer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $8,490 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”