Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 472
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $5,603,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Ryan Dean Olson | Erwin, SD 57233 | $23,796 |
62 | Neil Palmer Rommereim | De Smet, SD 57231 | $23,437 |
63 | Gullickson Cattle Company Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $23,255 |
64 | Bryan Jensen | Badger, SD 57214 | $23,148 |
65 | Jensen Double J Farms | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $23,090 |
66 | Mark Ely Johnson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $23,047 |
67 | Shamrock Farms Inc %j Huntimer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $22,767 |
68 | Megan Eichler | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $22,633 |
69 | Norman Ernest Koehlmoos | De Smet, SD 57231 | $21,749 |
70 | Trent Cowan Damm | Arlington, SD 57212 | $21,745 |
71 | Raymond Johnson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $21,487 |
72 | Norman Madison | Carthage, SD 57323 | $21,057 |
73 | Lance Nichols | De Smet, SD 57231 | $20,994 |
74 | Michael Kretchmer | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $20,934 |
75 | James W Kretchmer | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $20,934 |
76 | Nicholas Todd Wilkinson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $20,879 |
77 | Gary Osvog | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $20,832 |
78 | Timothy Martin Steffensen | De Smet, SD 57231 | $20,565 |
79 | Sandy Leo Schultz | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $19,757 |
80 | Paul Larson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $19,698 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”