Crop Disaster Assistance Program in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 811
Recipients of Crop Disaster Assistance Program from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $14,101,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Crop Disaster Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Neil Palmer Rommereim | De Smet, SD 57231 | $58,657 |
62 | Curt Wehlander | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $58,521 |
63 | Gene William Austad | Oldham, SD 57051 | $57,416 |
64 | Brian Driscoll | De Smet, SD 57231 | $56,697 |
65 | Jay Dean Hojer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $56,289 |
66 | Raymond Kerr | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $56,263 |
67 | Steven W Jensen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $54,377 |
68 | Duane Erving Hojer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $54,212 |
69 | Larry Forbes | De Smet, SD 57231 | $54,182 |
70 | Bob C Miller | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $53,639 |
71 | Gene Wienk | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $53,534 |
72 | Alden Dennis Boyd | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $53,352 |
73 | Dean Marvin Tolzin | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $52,816 |
74 | Randy Reed Ogren | De Smet, SD 57231 | $52,207 |
75 | Reed Farms Inc | Oldham, SD 57051 | $51,325 |
76 | Arlyn Gene Leonhardt | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $50,166 |
77 | Daniel R Geyer | De Smet, SD 57231 | $50,056 |
78 | William T Driscoll | De Smet, SD 57231 | $49,819 |
79 | Russell Miller | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $47,965 |
80 | Gregory Lee Ward | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $47,531 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”