Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 207
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $1,164,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Sally A Wilkinson | Erwin, SD 57233 | $5,421 |
62 | Wade R Geyer | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $5,369 |
63 | Jeffrey Madison | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $5,365 |
64 | Keith Larson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $5,308 |
65 | Jody Alan Weiss | Hetland, SD 57212 | $5,304 |
66 | Ronald Blachford | De Smet, SD 57231 | $5,188 |
67 | Jacobsen Farms Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $5,137 |
68 | Jason M Nelson | Willow Lake, SD 57278 | $5,084 |
69 | Jensen Double J Farms | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $4,996 |
70 | Neil Palmer Rommereim | De Smet, SD 57231 | $4,979 |
71 | Stephan John Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $4,934 |
72 | Troy Michael Forbes | De Smet, SD 57231 | $4,744 |
73 | Jonathan Lee Penner | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $4,711 |
74 | Steven Allen Dejong | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $4,640 |
75 | Paige Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $4,564 |
76 | Brooke Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $4,564 |
77 | Bryan Jensen | Badger, SD 57214 | $4,549 |
78 | , | $4,541 | |
79 | John B Doyle | Erwin, SD 57233 | $4,472 |
80 | Steven Lyle Page | De Smet, SD 57231 | $4,417 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”