Market Gains in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 210
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $3,368,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Warne-pommer Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $17,340 |
62 | Ryan Dean Olson | Erwin, SD 57233 | $17,219 |
63 | Jon Charles Albrecht | Howard, SD 57349 | $17,063 |
64 | Elaine Jensen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $16,942 |
65 | Loren Dee Jensen | Oldham, SD 57051 | $16,934 |
66 | Jody Alan Weiss | Hetland, SD 57212 | $16,727 |
67 | Bradley Lingbeck | Ramona, SD 57054 | $16,167 |
68 | Patrick Eugene Martin | Bryant, SD 57221 | $16,096 |
69 | Lonnie Dean Penner | De Smet, SD 57231 | $16,011 |
70 | Darrell Fast | Huron, SD 57350 | $15,634 |
71 | Cherrlyn Fast | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $15,634 |
72 | David Joel Duffy | Oldham, SD 57051 | $15,414 |
73 | Paul Warren Casper | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $15,379 |
74 | Douglas Bumann | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $15,316 |
75 | Ronald Blachford | De Smet, SD 57231 | $15,297 |
76 | Robert Sneesby | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $14,949 |
77 | Gregory Orville Noem | De Smet, SD 57231 | $14,642 |
78 | Odegaard Ranch | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $14,634 |
79 | Bradley John Albrecht | Arlington, SD 57212 | $14,517 |
80 | William R Wilkinson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $14,485 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”