Total Conservation Programs in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 224
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $1,274,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Dennis G Olson | Huron, SD 57350 | $7,238 |
62 | Farron Pratt | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $6,761 |
63 | Karie Rottluff | Oldham, SD 57051 | $6,351 |
64 | Merrill Allen Nelson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $6,234 |
65 | Ralph Eugene Nelson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $6,164 |
66 | Deloris Gilbertson | Arlington, SD 57212 | $6,159 |
67 | Richard Clayton Abrahamson | Oldham, SD 57051 | $6,028 |
68 | Richard W. And Mildred L Henriksen Farm Trust | Arlington, SD 57212 | $6,020 |
69 | Wertz Family Limited Partnership | Huron, SD 57350 | $5,996 |
70 | Thomas V Augustin Trust | Flandreau, SD 57028 | $5,983 |
71 | Lauren Poppen | Oakes, ND 58474 | $5,857 |
72 | James R. Fox Trust U/d/t 10-7-2016 | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $5,825 |
73 | Elizabeth Penner Revocable Trust | De Smet, SD 57231 | $5,814 |
74 | Richard A Boldt | Arlington, SD 57212 | $5,743 |
75 | Shamrock Farms Inc %j Huntimer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $5,454 |
76 | Kris Larson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $5,338 |
77 | Alokard Acres, LLC | Sioux Falls, SD 57105 | $5,332 |
78 | Alan Warren Christensen | Arlington, SD 57212 | $4,996 |
79 | Harvey Miller | Arlington, SD 57212 | $4,861 |
80 | Gary W Edman | Arlington, SD 57212 | $4,815 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”