Conservation Reserve Program in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 684
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $25,104,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jerri Andersen-jeralynn Andersen Living Trust | Arlington, SD 57212 | $85,780 |
82 | William Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $84,015 |
83 | Fast View Farms | Huron, SD 57350 | $83,292 |
84 | Marnell Muilenburg Frizzell | Kamiah, ID 83536 | $83,067 |
85 | Jean L Lee | Arlington, SD 57212 | $83,030 |
86 | Sorenson Livestock Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $82,654 |
87 | Jill Stearns | Madison, SD 57042 | $82,487 |
88 | Plainview Farm | Oldham, SD 57051 | $81,248 |
89 | Deloris Gilbertson | Arlington, SD 57212 | $80,713 |
90 | Alokard Acres, LLC | Sioux Falls, SD 57105 | $79,292 |
91 | Dennis Ranschau | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $78,726 |
92 | Jerry Geyer | Huron, SD 57350 | $77,528 |
93 | Frank E Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $77,380 |
94 | Hubert Vincent Kazmerzak | Erwin, SD 57233 | $77,193 |
95 | Violet Wendel | De Smet, SD 57231 | $76,454 |
96 | Farron Pratt | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $76,267 |
97 | Roger Hoyer | Arlington, SD 57212 | $76,243 |
98 | Clarence Penner Revocable Trust | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $75,755 |
99 | C Roger Lewis Agency Inc | Morehead, KY 40351 | $75,677 |
100 | Odis Paulson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $75,404 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”