Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 138
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $1,052,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Denver S Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $395 |
102 | Mikinley Robert Augustine Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $395 |
103 | Becky Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $395 |
104 | Randi Kristine Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $395 |
105 | Wayne Alan Nichols | De Smet, SD 57231 | $389 |
106 | Clint D Hoyer | Winfred, SD 57076 | $388 |
107 | Eldred Lynn Carlson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $386 |
108 | Lance Nichols | De Smet, SD 57231 | $375 |
109 | Dacotah Bank ** | Rolla, ND 58367 | $368 |
110 | Steele Dakota Farms LLC | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $340 |
111 | Russell Everette Schultz | Arlington, SD 57212 | $289 |
112 | Dale Josephsen | Arlington, SD 57212 | $286 |
113 | Darin Zell | De Smet, SD 57231 | $283 |
114 | Keaton Douglas Hoyer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $274 |
115 | Robert L Cihak | Arlington, SD 57212 | $249 |
116 | Dale Virchow | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $240 |
117 | Timothy James Stewart | Arlington, SD 57212 | $221 |
118 | Kyle E Lee | De Smet, SD 57231 | $211 |
119 | Jody Alan Weiss | Hetland, SD 57212 | $180 |
120 | Edward William Verhelst | Huron, SD 57350 | $176 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”