Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 444
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $5,694,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Stephan John Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $12,726 |
122 | Brent Lee Mundhenke | De Smet, SD 57231 | $12,700 |
123 | Steven Lyle Page | De Smet, SD 57231 | $12,470 |
124 | Daniel John Rommereim | De Smet, SD 57231 | $12,319 |
125 | Brett Anderson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $12,264 |
126 | Brady Larsen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $12,212 |
127 | Roger G Lee | De Smet, SD 57231 | $12,179 |
128 | Hojer Ranch LLC | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $12,001 |
129 | Trent Cowan Damm | Arlington, SD 57212 | $11,833 |
130 | Ronald Blachford | De Smet, SD 57231 | $11,365 |
131 | Dale Darwin Hoyer | Howard, SD 57349 | $11,359 |
132 | Eric Casper | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $11,215 |
133 | Austin Steven Gilbertson | Arlington, SD 57212 | $11,017 |
134 | Rj Partnership | De Smet, SD 57231 | $11,015 |
135 | Keith Larson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $10,866 |
136 | Ronald R Geyer | De Smet, SD 57231 | $10,722 |
137 | James H Jensen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $10,652 |
138 | Kevin Wesley Toews | De Smet, SD 57231 | $10,481 |
139 | Roger Hoyer | Arlington, SD 57212 | $10,431 |
140 | Gary Lund | Arlington, SD 57212 | $10,427 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”