Total Commodity Programs in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 586
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $7,628,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Bennie Widman | De Smet, SD 57231 | $14,018 |
162 | Erin F Wilkinson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $13,986 |
163 | Brett Anderson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $13,934 |
164 | Brian Howard Carlson | Hetland, SD 57212 | $13,862 |
165 | Gale Cecil Larson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $13,633 |
166 | Wesley Allan Toews | De Smet, SD 57231 | $13,616 |
167 | William Wayne Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $13,597 |
168 | Raymond Kerr | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $13,169 |
169 | Gene Wienk | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $13,139 |
170 | Donald Clelland | Arlington, SD 57212 | $13,125 |
171 | James H Jensen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $13,018 |
172 | Alan Liljegren | Brookings, SD 57006 | $12,909 |
173 | Bryan Sneesby | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $12,736 |
174 | John Blachford | Desmet, SD 57231 | $12,701 |
175 | Poppen Farms Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $12,566 |
176 | Virgil N Jensen Estate | De Smet, SD 57231 | $12,546 |
177 | Stephan John Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $12,541 |
178 | Gary Randall Noem | Bryant, SD 57221 | $12,407 |
179 | Steven J Wienk | De Smet, SD 57231 | $12,298 |
180 | Chad Hoyer | Arlington, SD 57212 | $12,181 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”