Farm Subsidy information
Kingsbury County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,373
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $483,482,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Roger Hoyer | Arlington, SD 57212 | $1,893,982 |
22 | Wilkinson Ranch Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,707,205 |
23 | Chad Alan Murphy | Arlington, SD 57212 | $1,580,222 |
24 | Hi Spirit Ranch Inc | De Smet, SD 57231 | $1,578,436 |
25 | Odegaard Family Farms Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,501,015 |
26 | Paul Warren Casper | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,479,529 |
27 | Rusche Bros | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $1,400,520 |
28 | Peckenpaugh Ranch Inc | Carthage, SD 57323 | $1,399,311 |
29 | Pleasant Hill Farm | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $1,389,588 |
30 | Edward Frank Wilkinson | Erwin, SD 57233 | $1,385,718 |
31 | Bryan Sneesby | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,374,368 |
32 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $1,353,170 |
33 | James P Coughlin | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $1,315,729 |
34 | Mark Ely Johnson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $1,313,262 |
35 | Douglas Charles Meyer | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $1,307,418 |
36 | Kingsbury Hutterian Brethren Inc. | Willow Lake, SD 57278 | $1,285,266 |
37 | Lynn D Jensen | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,274,633 |
38 | Jacobsen Farms Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,216,116 |
39 | Dean Marvin Tolzin | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,206,211 |
40 | Shamrock Farms Inc %j Huntimer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $1,183,237 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”