Farm Subsidy information
Kingsbury County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,265
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $436,733,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Shamrock Farms Inc %j Huntimer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $1,082,447 |
42 | William Lee Rydbom | De Smet, SD 57231 | $1,062,638 |
43 | Mark Eldon Jensen | Badger, SD 57214 | $1,057,622 |
44 | Catherine A Murphy | Arlington, SD 57212 | $1,024,336 |
45 | Raymond Kerr | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $1,014,798 |
46 | Jerome Joe Gruenhagen | De Smet, SD 57231 | $997,604 |
47 | Gullickson Cattle Company Inc | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $989,269 |
48 | Allan Rieck | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $986,188 |
49 | Neil Palmer Rommereim | De Smet, SD 57231 | $973,895 |
50 | Ronald R Geyer | De Smet, SD 57231 | $950,234 |
51 | Debra D Coughlin | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $943,059 |
52 | Ruth B Aughenbaugh | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $928,241 |
53 | Kopman Brothers | Bryant, SD 57221 | $923,822 |
54 | Daniel Leroy Tolzin | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $922,720 |
55 | Michael Kretchmer | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $917,669 |
56 | Warren Arthur Casper | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $915,784 |
57 | Alden Dennis Boyd | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $908,273 |
58 | Norma Albrecht | De Smet, SD 57231 | $903,477 |
59 | James W Kretchmer | Bancroft, SD 57353 | $900,551 |
60 | Jon Nelson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $883,203 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”