Farm Subsidy information
Kingsbury County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Kingsbury County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,373
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kingsbury County, South Dakota totaled $483,482,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jon Nelson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $885,665 |
62 | Triple F Ranch | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $883,108 |
63 | Michael Tolzin | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $873,573 |
64 | Keith Larson | De Smet, SD 57231 | $865,300 |
65 | Dale Darwin Hoyer | Howard, SD 57349 | $848,375 |
66 | Hugh Evans | Iroquois, SD 57353 | $845,035 |
67 | Alan Warren Christensen | Arlington, SD 57212 | $840,704 |
68 | Richard P Baier | De Smet, SD 57231 | $836,686 |
69 | Douglas Vincent Kazmerzak | Erwin, SD 57233 | $824,022 |
70 | Roger A Haufschild | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $821,354 |
71 | Sandy Leo Schultz | Lake Norden, SD 57248 | $808,777 |
72 | Alan J Vedvei | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $801,858 |
73 | Steven J Duffy | Oldham, SD 57051 | $786,280 |
74 | Harvey Miller | Arlington, SD 57212 | $778,850 |
75 | Jeffry Gruenhagen | De Smet, SD 57231 | $756,525 |
76 | Eugene Steffensen | De Smet, SD 57231 | $737,922 |
77 | Plainview Farm | Oldham, SD 57051 | $736,258 |
78 | Lonnie Dean Penner | De Smet, SD 57231 | $729,209 |
79 | Catherine Nelson | Lake Preston, SD 57249 | $728,620 |
80 | Scottie Duane Hojer | Oldham, SD 57051 | $727,301 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”